Real World Application Paper 1 Instructions Focus: Strategic Planning Implications Concerning Resource Allocation and Budgeting Revenues and Expenses Instructions: Select 1 of the 2 techniques/concepts (SWOT ANALYSIS and VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS)discussed in your Discussion Board Forum 1 thread and develop a real-world application paper. Select a company (CVS or WALMART) that you work for now or have worked for in the past, or a company in your community of which you have sufficient knowledge. Show how the selected technique/concept would be applied to that particular business in its strategic allocation of financial resources in the area of budgeting revenues and expenses. Your paper must be in current APA format and must include references from at least 7 peer-reviewed journal articles. The paper must be at least 5–7 pages, not including the title page and reference page.
copy_of_pac_psych_medicaid_grid.xlsx
busi730_real_world_application_papers_grading_rubric_1__1_.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Medicaid Plan
Beacon – From Aetna Healthy Kids or Coventry Healthy Kids
Cenpatico
CMS Medicaid/Ped-I-Care (Any)
First Coast Advantage (HMO)
(Baker, Nassau,Duval, Clay, St Johns, Flagler, Volusia counties
ONLY)
Freedom( HMO (Specialty Plans)
Full Medicaid
Humana
Magellan
Molina
Optum – From Medicaid Prestige
Prestige Health Choice (HMO)
(Carves out to Optum)
Simply/Clear Health Alliance (HMO)
Sunshine State Health Plan (HMO)
Sunshine Healthy Kids
United Health Care (HMO)
WellCare dba StayWell (HMO)
Psychology
Psychiatry
Internal Referrals Only – (No PCP
referral required)
No
Internal Referrals Only – (No PCP
referral required)
Internal Referrals Only – (No PCP
referral required)
No
Internal Referrals Only – (No PCP
referral required)
No
No
No
No
Internal Referrals Only – (No PCP
referral required)
No
No
No
Internal Referrals Only – (No PCP
referral required)
Internal Referrals Only – (No PCP
referral required)
No
Adult/Child: Internal Referrals – (PCP
Referral Required)
Adult/Child: Internal Referrals – (PCP
Referral Required)
Adult/Child: Internal Referrals – (PCP
Referral Required)
Adult/Child: Internal Referrals – (PCP
Referral Required)
No
No
No
No
Yes
Internal Referrals Only – (No PCP
referral required)
No
Internal Referrals Only – (No PCP
referral required)
Internal Referrals Only – (No PCP
referral required)
Internal Referrals Only – (No PCP
referral required)
Internal Referrals Only – (No PCP
referral required)
Sleep/Weight Mgmt
Addiction
Vero
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Internal Referrals
Only
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
Criteria
Content
105 – 0 points
Synthesis of
Knowledge
Focus/Thesis
45 – 0 points
BUSI 730
Real World Applications Paper Grading Rubric
Levels of Achievement
Advanced
45 to 42 points
Proficient
41 to 39 points
Developing
38 to 1 points
Student exhibits a
defined and clear
understanding of the
assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and
well constructed to
help guide the reader
throughout the
assignment. Student
builds upon the thesis
of the assignment with
well-documented and
exceptional supporting
facts, figures, and/or
statements.
Establishes a good
comprehension of topic
and in the building of
the thesis. Student
demonstrates an
effective presentation of
thesis, with most
support statements
helping to support the
key focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic
understanding of the
intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis
helps to guide the
development of the
assignment, the reader
may have some difficulty
in seeing linkages
between thoughts. While
student has included a
few supporting facts and
statements, this has
limited the quality of the
assignment
Not present
0 points
Foundation of
Knowledge
30 – 0 points
30 to 28 points
27 to 26 points
25 to 1 points
Student demonstrates
proficient command of
the subject matter in
the assignment.
Assignment shows an
impressive level of
depth of student’s
ability to relate course
content to practical
examples and
applications. Student
provides
comprehensive
analysis of details,
facts, and concepts in a
logical sequence.
Student exhibits aboveaverage usage of subject
matter in assignment.
Student provides aboveaverage ability in
relating course content
in examples given.
Details and facts
presented provide an
adequate presentation
of student’s current
level of subject matter
knowledge.
The assignment reveals
that the student has a
general, fundamental
understanding of the
course material. There
are areas of some
concern in the linkages
provided between facts
and supporting
statements. Student
generally explains
concepts, but only meets
the minimum
requirements in this area
0 points
30 to 28 points*
Application of
Knowledge
Student demonstrates a
(Critical Thinking higher level of critical
Skills
thinking necessary for
graduate-level work.
30 – 0 points
Student provides a
strategic approach in
presenting examples of
problem solving or
critical thinking, while
drawing logical
conclusions which are
not immediately
obvious. Student
provides wellsupported ideas and
reflection with a
variety of current
and/or world views in
the assignment.
27 to 26 points*
25 to 1 points*
Student exhibits a good
command of criticalthinking skills in the
presentation of material
and supporting
statements. Assignment
demonstrates the
student’s above-average
use of relating concepts
by using a variety of
factors. Overall, student
provides adequate
conclusions, with 2 or
fewer errors.
Student takes a common,
conventional approach in
guiding the reader
through various linkages
and connections
presented in assignment.
Student presents a
limited perspective on
key concepts throughout
assignment. Student
appears to have problems
applying information in a
problem-solving manner.
0 points
Structure
45 – 0 points
Organization of
Ideas Format
15 – 0 points
Advanced
15 to 14 points
Student thoroughly
understands and excels
at explaining all major
points. An original,
unique, and/or
imaginative approach
to overall ideas,
concepts, and findings
is presented. Overall
format of assignment
includes an
appropriate
introduction (or
abstract), welldeveloped paragraphs,
and conclusion.
Finished assignment
demonstrates student’s
ability to plan and
organize research in a
logical sequence.
Proficient
13 points
Developing
12 to 1 points
Student explains the
majority of points and
concepts in the
assignment. Student
demonstrates a good
skill level in formatting
and organizing material
in assignment. Student
presents an aboveaverage level of
preparedness, with few
formatting errors
Student applies some
points and concepts
incorrectly. Student uses
a variety of formatting
styles, with some
inconsistencies
throughout the paper.
Assignment does not
have a continuous
pattern of logical
sequencing.
Not present
0 points
Writing Skill
15 to 14 points*
13 points*
15 – 0 points
Student demonstrates
an excellent command
of grammar, as well as
presents research in a
clear and concise
writing style. Presents
a thorough, extensive
understanding of word
usage. Student excels in
the selection and
development of a wellplanned research
assignment.
Assignment is errorfree and reflects
student’s ability to
prepare graduate-level
writing for possible
publication in a peerreviewed (refereed)
journal.
Student provides an
effective display of good
writing and grammar.
Assignment reflects
student’s ability to
select appropriate word
usage and presents an
above-average
presentation of a given
topic or issue.
Assignment appears to
be well written with no
more than 3 errors.
Student provides a good
final product that covers
the above-minimal
requirements.
12 to 1 points*
Assignment provides a
basic, but borderline,
perspective of student’s
research abilities. Student
has incorporated less
than 3 sources, which
does not attempt to cover
key elements of
assignment.
0 points
Research Skill
15 – 0 points
15 to 14 points*
Student provides
sophisticated synthesis
of complex body of
information in the
preparation of
assignment. Research
provided by student
contributes
significantly to the
development of the
overall thesis. Student
incorporates at least 5
quality references in
assignment. Student
incorporates a variety
of research resources
and methodology in the
preparation of
assignment.
Instructor Comments
Raw Score 150 points
13 points*
12 to 1 points*
Student achieves an
above-average
synthesis of research,
but interpretation is
narrow in scope and
description within
assignment. Assignment
contains less than 4
resources, and presents
an average overview of
key concepts.
Assignment provides a
basic, but borderline,
perspective of student’s
research abilities. Student
has incorporated less
than 3 sources, which
does not attempt to cover
key elements of
assignment.
0 points
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
