Hello, I need help with my Essay assignment the instruction in the file word please read it carefully and do the requirement and there is a rubric as well I have provide you my Essay with pro’s comment let me know if you have any question and thank you for your help
whatsapp_image_2019_03_14_at_3.00.13_pm.jpeg
whatsapp_image_2019_03_14_at_3.00.14_pm.jpeg
whatsapp_image_2019_03_14_at_3.00.14_pm_1_.jpeg
ethical_theories_analysis.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
For this second draft of your ethical theories analysis, you will address the critiques I
gave you in your earlier draft and revise the assignment thoroughly. You will delve
somewhat deeper than you did in the earlier draft–from approximately 500-700 words to
approximately 750-1000.
You will also add a couple of other components:
1. You will find a law or policy that is relevant to this case and determine where any
policy vacuums might be present.
2. You will add two new sources to address your analysis–the policy or law can be one
of them. You might find another article on the same or a similar issue for the other,
or theoretical work, or…you decide what would be needed.
3. Be sure you include a conclusion that MUST include an overall assessment of
whether or not the actions taken were ethical based on your analysis of the four
frameworks AND propose a different policy/action if you decide it was not ethical.
You CAN add your own opinion and whether it changed through the analysis, if you
wish to.
Why this assignment?
This assignment assists you in understanding ethical theories and the processes of
analyzing a case by applying the analysis to your case. It helps you to develop your
critical insights regarding ethics in information technology systems and practices. And
this second draft helps you to further your ability to communicate ethical issues and
solutions more effectively. (Competencies 1, 2, 5)
Overview
You will create an overview of each of four ethical theories in relation to a particular
case (as assigned in the 3.2 module), and assess the pros and cons of each theory in
determining the ethics, and identify policy vacuums and any conceptual muddles.
Details:
Using the case that your house or group accessed in session 3.2, you will look at each
of four ethical Frameworks, similarly to the way we did it in class on the ethical
framework worksheet. You will look at deontology, utilitarianism, ethics of care, and
Rawlsian justice. You will identify the factors at play: conceptual muddles, policy
vacuums, or Faustian Bargains. For this draft, go into far greater depth on the
policy vacuums.
Then for each framework you will look at the pros and cons of using the framework to
determine the ethics related to the case. Describe which factors would be relevant to
determining the ethical behavior in the case for each framework. For example if you are
evaluating the case according to utilitarianism, what is the greatest good in this
case? Or if you are looking at deontology, what is your duty? How do you best
express that duty while keeping in mind the categorical imperative (both the part
about universality and using people as a means to an end). What care might be
associated with the case? And who might be the group of people that is the least well
off in the case? These are the types of factors you should consider as you write.
The essay should be between 750 and 1000 words. APA formatted in-text citations and
reference list. The actual paper should just be an easy to read font such as Georgia, Gill
Sans, Minion, etc. 12 point and either single or double spaced is fine. Please don’t put
your name on the main text of the document, though if you WANT to make a title page
you can put it there (no title page required).
Note that students will be grading each other’s work on this essay.
You will turn this assignment in on canvas in the appropriate drop box. We will be
grading it the next day in class.
This is the checklist/rubric by which we will be assessing the assignment–IT HAS
CHANGED SLIGHTLY FROM THE FIRST RUBRIC:
Checklist/Rubric for Ethical Theories Assignment
Number of the paper assessed:_________
•
•
•
Discusses Conceptual Muddles, .25 pts.
Discusses Faustian Bargains, .25 pts.
Discusses Policy Vacuums, 1 pts. Includes a relevant policy/law and assesses
policy vacuums in relation to that law/policy
o Total out of 1.5 pts.______
•
Utilitarianism is discussed relative to the case, including:
o Which “greatest good” has been identified as most relevant, .25 pts.
o Determines that the case is ethical or not ethical using utilitarianist framework .25
pts.
▪ Total out of 0.5 pts.______
•
Deontology is discussed relative to the case, including:
o Which “duty” has been identified as most relevant, .25 pts.
o Discusses the categorical imperative, .5 pts.
o Determines that the case is ethical or not ethical using deontology.
▪ Total out of 0.75 pts.______
•
Ethics of care is discussed relative to the case, including:
o What sort of care has been identified as most relevant, .25 pts.
o
•
•
•
•
Determines that the case is ethical or not ethical using ethics of care.
▪ Total out of 0.75 pts.______
The Rawlsian justice framework is discussed relative to the case, including:
o Which group or groups have been identified as most likely to be the “least welloff”, .25 pts.
o Determines that the case is ethical or not ethical using the Rawlsian justice
framework, .25 pts.
▪ Total out of 0.5 pts.______
Includes a conclusion that assesses:
o The overall morality of the action taken, given the analysis of the four
frameworks.
o If it is not ethical, then a proposal of how to amend or change the action/policy so
it is ethical.
▪ Total out of 0.5 pts.______
You must include 2 or more sources to discuss the ethics of this case, one of which
can be the policy or law you discuss. 0.25 pts.
You must address the critiques I levied in your earlier paper 0.25 pts.
▪
Total out of 0.5 pts.______
Length: Is the essay fewer than 750 words? Subtract 1 point for every 0-100 words
fewer than 750 (650-749=Subtract 1; 500-549=subtract 2; 400-459=subtract 3; and so
on). Subtract___________
Spelling, grammar, or syntax errors, subtract 0.25 pts for each over 4. (each person
gets 4 “free” errors, then they “cost” 0.25 pts each) Subtract___________
Muddled writing? Take 1 pts off for any individual instance of writing too muddled or
confusing to understand. This is a harsher penalty than in the earlier draft, as I expect it
to be well-edited. Subtract___________
Total points earned out of 5: _____________
…
Our essay writing service fulfills every request with the highest level of urgency.
attachment
