DQ1Reflect on collection of data, data cleansing and preparation activities, and selection and application of models, including challenges/struggles, procedures, approach, etc.How do you know that the data you are collecting will be useful?DQ2When summarizing your data, how did you decide which visualization tool you would use to best communicate this information (bar graph or line graph)?AssignmentNow that you have identified the business problem, translated it into an analytics problem, identified the data needs, and acquired the data, you will use data that you have found or with the company’s permission you can use its data for analysis to resolve the analytics problem. Using one or more of the following software applications (IBM SPSS Modeler, SPSS Statistics, Excel, Tableau, or R), analyze the data so that the findings can be used to address the established business problem in your company.Write a 750-1,000 word paper that includes the following information for your data (ensure that specific screenshots of graphs, tables, etc., are provided):Conduct an exploratory data analysis: What information is contained in the data set?Describe key features of the data and any significant relationships you find.How did you verify that the data was reliable before proceeding?What problems did you find and how did you address them?What relationships did you find in the data?Any missing data?Analyze trends with respect to any appropriate characteristics that you may have discovered.Supplement your description with appropriate charts/figures. Data can be (but are not necessarily limited to) the following:Line graphsPie chartsBar chartsScatter plotsIndicate the steps you have taken to investigate the quality of the data and indicate any variables you have transformed or discarded as a result.Provide a summary that provides a detailed overview of the trends identified based upon the analysis.Segment the data accordingly, if needed, to help describe the data behavior.How are you going to summarize data samples?Provide a detailed statistical summary of all information provided.Provide the raw software files that you used for this assignment. If R was used, provide a *.txt file of all the commands used.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
rubric_print_format__2_.xlsx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Course Code
MIS-690
Class Code
MIS-690-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Description of the Information in the Data Set
20.0%
Description of the Key Features of the Data and
the Significant Relationships
10.0%
Description of the Appropriate Charts and
Figures
10.0%
Explanation of the Steps Taken to Investigate the
Quality of the Data and Any Variables
Transformed or Discarded
10.0%
Explanation of the Statistical Summary of the
Data Set Samples
15.0%
Raw Software Files
5.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Benchmark – Data Cleansing and Data Summary
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
A description of the information in the data set is not present.
A description of the reliable verified data, problems that were
found and addressed, relationships found in the data, any
missing data, and trends found is not present.
A description of the appropriate charts and figures is not
present.
An explanation of the steps taken to investigate the quality of
the data and any variables is not present.
An explanation of the statistical summary of the data set
samples is not present.
Raw software files are not included.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
120.0
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)
A description of the information in the data set is present, but
it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A description of the reliable verified data, problems that were
found and addressed, relationships found in the data, any
missing data, and trends found is present, but it lacks detail
or is incomplete.
A description of the appropriate charts and figures is present,
but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
An explanation of the steps taken to investigate the quality of
the data and any variables is present, but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.
An explanation of the statistical summary of the data set
samples is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
Raw software files are incomplete or incorrect.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
A description of the information in the data set is present but
done at a minimal level.
A description of the reliable verified data, problems that were
found and addressed, relationships found in the data, any
missing data, and trends found is present but done at a
minimal level.
A description of the appropriate charts and figures is present
but done at a minimal level.
An explanation of the steps taken to investigate the quality of
the data and any variables is present but done at a minimal
level.
An explanation of the statistical summary of the data set
samples is present but done at a minimal level.
Raw software files are included and partially correct.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
A description of the information in the data set is clearly
provided and well developed.
A description of the reliable verified data, problems that were
found and addressed, relationships found in the data, any
missing data, and trends found is clearly provided and well
developed.
A description of the appropriate charts and figures is clearly
provided and well developed.
An explanation of the steps taken to investigate the quality of
the data and any variables is clearly provided and well
developed.
An explanation of the statistical summary of the data set
samples is clearly provided and well developed.
Raw software files are included and mostly correct.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
A description of the information in the data set is thoroughly
developed with supporting details.
A description of the reliable verified data, problems that were
found and addressed, relationships found in the data, any
missing data, and trends found is thoroughly developed with
supporting details.
A description of the appropriate charts and figures is
thoroughly developed with supporting details.
An explanation of the steps taken to investigate the quality of
the data and any variables is thoroughly developed with
supporting details.
An explanation of the statistical summary of the data set
samples is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Raw software files are included and correct.
Comments
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
