Please review details carefully!! This is final project and needs to be perfect with no mistakes. Answer every question in detail listed below, meets the rubric requirements and it is imperative citations are correct. Thank youOption #2: Medicaid Managed Care – EssayReview the Kohatsu, Payne, and Subramania article, “The Few Winner from Medicaid’s Shift to Managed Care (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..”Using data provided by the Kaiser Family Foundation Medicaid Managed Care Market Tracker (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., please identify three states that have not transitioned their Medicaid programs to the managed care model and three states that have shifted their Medicaid program to managed care.Then complete the following for your essay:Research the three states that have not shifted their Medicaid programs to the managed care model and discuss the reasons why each of these states has not transitioned. Explain if you agree or disagree with the rational of each state’s decision. Research the three states that have shifted their Medicaid programs to the managed care model and discuss their successes and challenges.Should the CMS mandate Medicaid managed care programs for every state? What are some of the pros and cons and arguments from the perspectives of states, the CMS, and the Medicaid beneficiaries?Your assignment should meet the following requirements:Be 10 to 12 pages.Include a title page and reference page, for a total of 12-14 pages.Be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Cite at least four credible sources, published within the last five years, in addition to the course textbook. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.Rubric RequirementHCM400 Mod 8 PPHCM400 Mod 8 PPCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationThe Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationThe Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationThe Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceThe Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content40.0 to >32.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of managed care as outlined in the option selection; correctly represents knowledge from the interview (if applicable), readings, and sources.32.0 to >24.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.24.0 to >16.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.16.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.40.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis – 150.0 to >40.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of either the interviewee’s responses to questions regarding industry regulations, or of the research that explains why the three identified states *have not* shifted their Medicaid programs.40.0 to >30.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis.30.0 to >20.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in critical analysis.20.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate critical analysis.50.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis – 250.0 to >40.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of either the interviewee’s responses to questions regarding industry challenges and the organization’s attitude toward managed care, or of the research that explains the successes and challenges of the three identified states that *have* switched to Medicaid.40.0 to >30.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis.30.0 to >20.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in critical analysis.20.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate critical analysis.50.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis and Evaluation60.0 to >48.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of either the interviewee’s response to the ACA and the future of the healthcare industry, including organizational governance; or of the future of Medicaid managed care programs and the pros and cons regarding implementing it nationally.48.0 to >36.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.36.0 to >24.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.24.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.60.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources10.0 to >8.0 ptsMeets ExpectationCites and integrates at least 4 current, scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.8.0 to >6.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationCites and integrates 3 current, scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.6.0 to >4.0 ptsBelow ExpectationCites and integrates 2 current, scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.4.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceCites and integrates 1 current, scholarly source in addition to the textbook.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Source Material10.0 to >8.0 ptsMeets ExpectationSources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.8.0 to >6.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.6.0 to >4.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor problems with selection and linkage of sources.4.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceSource selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSmall number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceProject is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar and Style20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationStrong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSmall number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationInconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidencePoor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the *CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements*, with no more than one significant error.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the *CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements*, with no more than two to three significant errors.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the *CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements*, with four to five significant errors.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the *CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements*, with more than five significant errors.20.0 ptsTotal Points: 300.0
