Select Page

I’m going to provide you with a book (“Made to Stick”) and based on the book answer these questions :all must be in double spaced, 12 times new roman, up to 2 pages.What are the six most common principles of sticky ideas, as identified by our authors?If you pull these directly from the text—make sure to make this clear (see note at bottom of page).Comment on the credibility of our authors.Given their background and experiences, do you find them to be credible sources of this information?Why or why not?What’s the significance of the research described in the section on “Tappers and Listeners”?Share some of the information and examples that you highlighted in your journal entries.Why do you think these examples stood out to you?How do you think marketers or “potential marketers” can use the information in this book?Would you recommend this book to a friend, colleague, or mentor?Why or why not?(Note and document direct quotations or excerpts from the text.For a long quote–indent and single space–followed by parentheses with page number. For shorter quotes—such as a word or two or a sentence, you may use quotation marks, followed by parentheses w/page number.)

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Paper Paper.
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

This book has been optimized for viewing
at a monitor setting of 1024 x 768 pixels.
random house
new york
Why Some Ideas Survive
and Others Die
• • •
Copyright © 2007 by Chip Heath and Dan Heath
All rights reserved.
Published in the United States by Random House,
an imprint of The Random House Publishing Group,
a division of Random House, Inc., New York.
Random House and colophon are registered
trademarks of Random House, Inc.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Heath, Chip.
Made to stick : why some ideas survive and others die /
Chip Heath & Dan Heath
p. cm.
Includes index.
eISBN: 978-1-58836-596-5
1. Social psychology. 2. Contagion (Social psychology).
3. Context effects (Psychology). I. Heath, Dan. II. Title.
HM1033.H43 2007
Designed by Stephanie Huntwork
To Dad, for driving an old tan Chevette
while putting us through college.
To Mom, for making us breakfast
every day for eighteen years. Each.
Kidney heist. Movie popcorn. Sticky = understandable, memorable, and effective in changing thought or behavior. Halloween candy. Six principles:
SUCCESs. The villain: Curse of Knowledge. It’s hard to be a tapper. Creativity
starts with templates.
Commander’s Intent. THE low-fare airline. Burying the lead and the inverted
pyramid. It’s the economy, stupid. Decision paralysis. Clinic: Sun exposure.
Names, names, and names. Simple = core + compact. Proverbs. The Palm
Pilot wood block. Using what’s there. The pomelo schema. High concept: Jaws
on a spaceship. Generative analogies: Disney’s “cast members.”
The successful flight safety announcement. The surprise brow. Gimmicky surprise and “postdictability.” Breaking the guessing machine. “The Nordie
who . . .” “No school next Thursday.” Clinic: Too much on foreign aid? Saturn’s
rings. Movie turning points. Gap theory of curiosity. Clinic: Fund-raising. Priming the gap: NCAA football. Pocketable radio. Man on the moon.
Sour grapes. Landscapes as eco-celebrities. Teaching subtraction with less abstraction. Soap-opera accounting. Velcro theory of memory. Brown eyes, blue
eyes. Engineers vs. manufacturers. The Ferraris go to Disney World. White
things. The leather computer. Clinic: Oral rehydration therapy. Hamburger
Helper and Saddleback Sam.
The Nobel-winning scientist no one believed. Flesh-eating bananas. Authority
and antiauthority. Pam Laffin, smoker. Powerful details. Jurors and the Darth
Vader toothbrush. The dancing seventy-three year old. Statistics: Nuclear warheads as BBs. The human-scale principle. Officemates as a soccer team.
Clinic: Shark attack hysteria. The Sinatra Test. Transporting Bollywood movies.
Edible fabric. Where’s the beef? Testable credentials. The Emotional Tank.
Clinic: Our flawed intuition. NBA rookie camp.
The Mother Teresa principle: If I look at the one, I will act. Beating smoking with
the Truth. Semantic stretch and why unique isn’t unique. Reclaiming “sportsmanship.” Schlocky but masterful mail-order ads. WIIFY. Cable television in
Tempe. Avoiding Maslow’s basement. Dining in Iraq. The popcorn popper and
political science. Clinic: Why study algebra? Don’t mess with Texas. Who cares
about duo piano? Creating empathy.
The day the heart monitor lied. Shop talk at Xerox. Helpful and unhelpful visualizations. Stories as flight simulators. Clinic: Dealing with problem students.
Jared, the 425-pound fast-food dieter. Spotting inspiring stories. The Challenge Plot. The Connection Plot. The Creativity Plot. Springboard stories at the
World Bank: A health worker in Zambia. How to make presenters angry with
Nice guys finish last. Elementary, my dear Watson. The power of spotting.
Curse of Knowledge again. Pay attention, understand, believe, care, and act.
Sticky problems: symptoms and solutions. John F. Kennedy versus Floyd Lee.
M A K I N G I D E A S S T I C K : T H E E A S Y R E F E R E N C E G U I D E 253
N O T E S 259
A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S 277
I N D E X 281
friend of a friend of ours is a frequent business traveler. Let’s
call him Dave. Dave was recently in Atlantic City for an important meeting with clients. Afterward, he had some time to
kill before his flight, so he went to a local bar for a drink.
He’d just finished one drink when an attractive woman approached and asked if she could buy him another. He was surprised
but flattered. Sure, he said. The woman walked to the bar and
brought back two more drinks—one for her and one for him. He
thanked her and took a sip. And that was the last thing he remembered.
Rather, that was the last thing he remembered until he woke up,
disoriented, lying in a hotel bathtub, his body submerged in ice.
He looked around frantically, trying to figure out where he was
and how he got there. Then he spotted the note:
don’t move. call 911.
A cell phone rested on a small table beside the bathtub. He
picked it up and called 911, his fingers numb and clumsy from the
ice. The operator seemed oddly familiar with his situation. She said,
“Sir, I want you to reach behind you, slowly and carefully. Is there a
tube protruding from your lower back?”
Anxious, he felt around behind him. Sure enough, there was a
The operator said, “Sir, don’t panic, but one of your kidneys has
been harvested. There’s a ring of organ thieves operating in this city,
and they got to you. Paramedics are on their way. Don’t move until
they arrive.”
ou’ve just read one of the most successful urban legends of the
past fifteen years. The first clue is the classic urban-legend opening: “A friend of a friend . . .” Have you ever noticed that our friends’
friends have much more interesting lives than our friends themselves?
You’ve probably heard the Kidney Heist tale before. There are
hundreds of versions in circulation, and all of them share a core of
three elements: (1) the drugged drink, (2) the ice-filled bathtub, and
(3) the kidney-theft punch line. One version features a married man
who receives the drugged drink from a prostitute he has invited to his
room in Las Vegas. It’s a morality play with kidneys.
Imagine that you closed the book right now, took an hourlong
break, then called a friend and told the story, without rereading it.
Chances are you could tell it almost perfectly. You might forget that
the traveler was in Atlantic City for “an important meeting with
clients”—who cares about that? But you’d remember all the important stuff.
The Kidney Heist is a story that sticks. We understand it, we remember it, and we can retell it later. And if we believe it’s true, it
might change our behavior permanently—at least in terms of accepting drinks from attractive strangers.
Contrast the Kidney Heist story with this passage, drawn from a
paper distributed by a nonprofit organization. “Comprehensive community building naturally lends itself to a return-on-investment ra-
tionale that can be modeled, drawing on existing practice,” it begins,
going on to argue that “[a] factor constraining the flow of resources to
CCIs is that funders must often resort to targeting or categorical requirements in grant making to ensure accountability.”
Imagine that you closed the book right now and took an hourlong
break. In fact, don’t even take a break; just call up a friend and retell
that passage without rereading it. Good luck.
Is this a fair comparison—an urban legend to a cherry-picked bad
passage? Of course not. But here’s where things get interesting: Think
of our two examples as two poles on a spectrum of memorability.
Which sounds closer to the communications you encounter at work?
If you’re like most people, your workplace gravitates toward the nonprofit pole as though it were the North Star.
Maybe this is perfectly natural; some ideas are inherently interesting
and some are inherently uninteresting. A gang of organ thieves—inherently interesting! Nonprofit financial strategy—inherently uninteresting! It’s the nature versus nurture debate applied to ideas: Are ideas born
interesting or made interesting?
Well, this is a nurture book.
So how do we nurture our ideas so they’ll succeed in the world?
Many of us struggle with how to communicate ideas effectively, how
to get our ideas to make a difference. A biology teacher spends an
hour explaining mitosis, and a week later only three kids remember
what it is. A manager makes a speech unveiling a new strategy as the
staffers nod their heads enthusiastically, and the next day the frontline employees are observed cheerfully implementing the old one.
Good ideas often have a hard time succeeding in the world. Yet
the ridiculous Kidney Heist tale keeps circulating, with no resources
whatsoever to support it.
Why? Is it simply because hijacked kidneys sell better than other
topics? Or is it possible to make a true, worthwhile idea circulate as effectively as this false idea?
The Truth About Movie Popcorn
Art Silverman stared at a bag of movie popcorn. It looked out of place
sitting on his desk. His office had long since filled up with fake-butter
fumes. Silverman knew, because of his organization’s research, that
the popcorn on his desk was unhealthy. Shockingly unhealthy, in
fact. His job was to figure out a way to communicate this message to
the unsuspecting moviegoers of America.
Silverman worked for the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), a nonprofit group that educates the public about nutrition. The CSPI sent bags of movie popcorn from a dozen theaters in
three major cities to a lab for nutritional analysis. The results surprised everyone.
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) recommends that a normal diet contain no more than 20 grams of saturated
fat each day. According to the lab results, the typical bag of popcorn
had 37 grams.
The culprit was coconut oil, which theaters used to pop their popcorn. Coconut oil had some big advantages over other oils. It gave the
popcorn a nice, silky texture, and released a more pleasant and natural aroma than the alternative oils. Unfortunately, as the lab results
showed, coconut oil was also brimming with saturated fat.
The single serving of popcorn on Silverman’s desk—a snack
someone might scarf down between meals—had nearly two days’
worth of saturated fat. And those 37 grams of saturated fat were
packed into a medium-sized serving of popcorn. No doubt a decentsized bucket could have cleared triple digits.
The challenge, Silverman realized, was that few people know
what “37 grams of saturated fat” means. Most of us don’t memorize
the USDA’s daily nutrition recommendations. Is 37 grams good or
bad? And even if we have an intuition that it’s bad, we’d wonder if it
was “bad bad” (like cigarettes) or “normal bad” (like a cookie or a
milk shake).
Even the phrase “37 grams of saturated fat” by itself was enough to
cause most people’s eyes to glaze over. “Saturated fat has zero appeal,” Silverman says. “It’s dry, it’s academic, who cares?”
Silverman could have created some kind of visual comparison—
perhaps an advertisement comparing the amount of saturated fat in
the popcorn with the USDA’s recommended daily allowance. Think
of a bar graph, with one of the bars stretching twice as high as the
But that was too scientific somehow. Too rational. The amount of
fat in this popcorn was, in some sense, not rational. It was ludicrous.
The CSPI needed a way to shape the message in a way that fully communicated this ludicrousness.
Silverman came up with a solution.
SPI called a press conference on September 27, 1992. Here’s
the message it presented: “A medium-sized ‘butter’ popcorn at a
typical neighborhood movie theater contains more artery-clogging fat
than a bacon-and-eggs breakfast, a Big Mac and fries for lunch, and a
steak dinner with all the trimmings—combined!”
The folks at CSPI didn’t neglect the visuals—they laid out the full
buffet of greasy food for the television cameras. An entire day’s worth
of unhealthy eating, displayed on a table. All that saturated fat—
stuffed into a single bag of popcorn.
The story was an immediate sensation, featured on CBS, NBC,
ABC, and CNN. It made the front pages of USA Today, the Los Angeles Times, and The Washington Post’s Style section. Leno and Letterman cracked jokes about fat-soaked popcorn, and headline writers
trotted out some doozies: “Popcorn Gets an ‘R’ Rating,” “Lights, Action, Cholesterol!” “Theater Popcorn is Double Feature of Fat.”
The idea stuck. Moviegoers, repulsed by these findings, avoided
popcorn in droves. Sales plunged. The service staff at movie houses
grew accustomed to fielding questions about whether the popcorn
was popped in the “bad” oil. Soon after, most of the nation’s biggest theater chains—including United Artists, AMC, and Loews—
announced that they would stop using coconut oil.
On Stickiness
This is an idea success story. Even better, it’s a truthful idea success
story. The people at CSPI knew something about the world that they
needed to share. They figured out a way to communicate the idea so
that people would listen and care. And the idea stuck—just like the
Kidney Heist tale.
And, let’s be honest, the odds were stacked against the CSPI. The
“movie popcorn is fatty” story lacks the lurid appeal of an organthieving gang. No one woke up in an oil-filled bathtub. The story
wasn’t sensational, and it wasn’t even particularly entertaining. Furthermore, there was no natural constituency for the news—few of us
make an effort to “stay up to date with popcorn news.” There were
no celebrities, models, or adorable pets involved.
In short, the popcorn idea was a lot like the ideas that most of us
traffic in every day—ideas that are interesting but not sensational,
truthful but not mind-blowing, important but not “life-or-death.” Unless you’re in advertising or public relations, you probably don’t have
many resources to back your ideas. You don’t have a multimilliondollar ad budget or a team of professional spinners. Your ideas need
to stand on their own merits.
We wrote this book to help you make your ideas stick. By “stick,”
we mean that your ideas are understood and remembered, and have
a lasting impact—they change your audience’s opinions or behavior.
At this point, it’s worth asking why you’d need to make your ideas
stick. After all, the vast majority of our daily communication doesn’t
require stickiness. “Pass the gravy” doesn’t have to be memorable.
When we tell our friends about our relationship problems, we’re not
trying to have a “lasting impact.”
So not every idea is stick-worthy. When we ask people how often
they need to make an idea stick, they tell us that the need arises between once a month and once a week, twelve to fifty-two times per
year. For managers, these are “big ideas” about new strategic directions and guidelines for behavior. Teachers try to convey themes and
conflicts and trends to their students—the kinds of themes and ways
of thinking that will endure long after the individual factoids have
faded. Columnists try to change readers’ opinions on policy issues.
Religious leaders try to share spiritual wisdom with their congregants.
Nonprofit organizations try to persuade volunteers to contribute their
time and donors to contribute their money to a worthy cause.
Given the importance of making ideas stick, it’s surprising how
little attention is paid to the subject. When we get advice on communicating, it often concerns our delivery: “Stand up straight, make eye
contact, use appropriate hand gestures. Practice, practice, practice
(but don’t sound canned).” Sometimes we get advice about structure:
“Tell ’em what you’re going to tell ’em. Tell ’em, then tell ’em what
you told ’em.” Or “Start by getting their attention—tell a joke or a
Another genre concerns knowing your audience: “Know what
your listeners care about, so you can tailor your communication to
them.” And, finally, there’s the most common refrain in the realm of
communication advice: Use repetition, repetition, repetition.
All of this advice has obvious merit, except, perhaps, for the emphasis on repetition. (If you have to tell someone the same thing ten
times, the idea probably wasn’t very well designed. No urban legend
has to be repeated ten times.) But this set of advice has one glaring
shortcoming: It doesn’t help Art Silverman as he tries to figure out the
best way to explain that movie popcorn is really unhealthful.
Silverman no doubt knows that he should make eye contact and
practice. But what message is he supposed to practice? He knows his
audience—they’re people who like popcorn and don’t realize how
unhealthy it is. So what message does he share with them? Compli-
cating matters, Silverman knew that he wouldn’t have the luxury of
repetition—he had only one shot to make the media care about his
Or think about an elementary-school teacher. She knows her
goal: to teach the material mandated by the state curriculum committee. She knows her audience: third graders with a range of knowledge and skills. She knows how to speak effectively—she’s a virtuoso
of posture and diction and eye contact. So the goal is clear, the audience is clear, and the format is clear. But the design of the message
itself is far from clear. The biology students need to understand mitosis—okay, now what? There are an infinite number of ways to teach
mitosis. Which way will stick? And how do you know in advance?
What Led to Made to Stick
The broad question, then, is how do you design an idea that sticks?
A few years ago the two of us—brothers Chip and Dan—realized
that both of us had been studying how ideas stick for about ten years.
Our expertise came from very different fields, but we had zeroed in
on the same question: Why do some ideas succeed while others fail?
Dan had developed a passion for education. He co-founded a
start-up publishing company called Thinkwell that asked a somewhat
heretical question: If you were going to build a textbook from scratch,
using video and technology instead of text, how would you do it? As
the editor in chief of Thinkwell, Dan had to work with his team to determine the best ways to teach subjects like economics, biology, calculus, and physics. He had an opportunity to work with some of the
most effective and best-loved professors in the country: the calculus
teacher who was also a stand-up comic; the biology teacher who was
named national Teacher of the Year; the economics teacher who was
also a chaplain and a playwright. Essentially, Dan enjoyed a crash
course in what makes great teachers great. And he found that, while
each teacher had a unique style, collectively their instructional
methodologies were almost identical.
Chip, as a professor at Stanford University, had spent about ten
years asking why bad ideas sometimes won out in the social marketplace of ideas. How could a false idea displace a true one? And what
made some ideas more viral than others? As an entry point into these
topics, he dove into the realm of “naturally sticky” ideas such as
urban legends and conspiracy theories. Over the years, he’s become
uncomfortably familiar with some of the most …
Purchase answer to see full

Order your essay today and save 10% with the discount code ESSAYHSELP